There are two major complaints cropping up about this season of Mad Men: the characters are too unlikeable and the commercial breaks are too abrupt. I’m waiting to see how the season plays out to say much about the first complaint (although I will note that I’ve found Don Draper pretty irredeemable for two or three seasons now, but my fascination has never wavered) but the second is in some ways more interesting. The abruptness of the cuts to commercial break on Mad Men is nothing new, but as more television critics stopped getting pre-air screeners from AMC and were forced to watch the episodes live, the complaints have become more and more vocal. However, there’s a possibility that I think is worth exploring: the commercial breaks are supposed to be jarring.
A couple of quick notes. First of all, it is important to establish that the jarring commercial breaks are a matter of authorial intent and not AMC’s fault. Mad Men is a hypnotic, languorous show, more so than almost anything else on TV, and snapping out of its trance is not easy. But, more to the point, there’s a specific structural quirk at play. For those who might not know, most commercial television scripts are structured to accommodate commercials by breaking them up into several acts. Each act corresponds to a segment and ends with an act break, some kind of moment that’s meant to push viewers into the commercial while making sure they’ll want to stick around to see what happens next. Matt Weiner and his writing staff intentionally write episodes of Mad Men without act breaks. They aren’t the only people who do this, but pretty much everyone else who does writes for premium channels like HBO, which are commercial free. This is how Weiner would have written scripts for The Sopranos and how screenwriters have been doing it for decades.
The writers aren’t stupid; they know they’re writing a show with commercials and could choose to accommodate the ads if they wanted. So why don’t they? It could be because this is simply how Weiner wrote on The Sopranos. But he’s not the only writer of the show and The Sopranos isn’t the only show he wrote for (he was also on the staff of Andy Richter Controls the Universe, which aired on FOX). It also could be so the show plays better on DVD and Netflix. But whatever the reason, the result is that it strengthens the show’s critique of American capitalism and, especially, the ways that advertising propagate ideology.
If you are already on-board with the concept that at least part of what Mad Men is doing is critiquing of American capitalism in general and advertising’s role within that system specifically, feel free to move along to the next paragraph, but I would like to show my work a little. Mad Men does more than just peel back the curtain on the process and people behind advertising; it looks like an advertisement. The gorgeous, meticulously arranged mise-en-scene wouldn’t look out of place in a Sterling-Cooper design, but an ad by the agency (or anyone else) would be using those images to suggest that the same perfection and happiness is within your reach through consumption of a given product. On Mad Men, the point is the opposite. These are the people living in those ads, consuming and consuming, and all they’re left with is emptiness and displeasure. Think of “The Wheel,” where Don turns family photos into a literal advertisement for Kodak, convinces himself that domestic perfection is within reach, and then returns to find an empty house.
So Mad Men is a show critiquing advertising’s role in society, but this is a difficult argument to coherently communicate when you have to stop the show down every ten minutes to air commercials. I would argue this is one of the reasons why scholars have been so quick to look down on TV for so much of its history: how incisive and critical can a series be when its main reason for existing is to provide a hospitable atmosphere for advertising. Mad Men side-steps this by creating as inhospitable an atmosphere as possible. The cuts are abrupt and jarring, the show makes no effort to incorporate breaks into its overall structure. The ads don’t fit because the show doesn’t think they should fit.
As a result, the commercials exist as the breaking of a trance, an imperfect, loud, and classless intrusion on the perfect structure of the show. They don’t fit and, as a result, draw attention to themselves. You think critically about them. You notice how irritating and fake they are. You are angry about their very presence. It is a small leap to move from feeling like the presence of the ads is artificial to feeling like the substance of the ads is artificial. Mad Men takes a simple fact of its form, commercial breaks, and contorts them until they fit its larger critique of American society.
Of course, the obvious retort to all of this is the fact that Mad Men has relied on product integration for much of its run. However, as the show has had more autonomy, it has reduced the amount of paid product placement and also made the real brands that appear in the show pay a steep price for that exposure. Most obviously, Jaguar, which was shown as structurally corrupt in “The Other Woman” and utterly unreliable in “Commissions and Fees.” Heinz is shown as immature and high schoolish, with an executive who is a unpleasant, petty mess and the Chevy car that Don and Teddy pitched for last night turns out to be a historic lemon. Those appearances may not have been paid for, but one that was, by Heineken, was used as a backdrop to Don’s humiliating manipulation of Betty.
If I had to guess, I would say the main reason Mad Men ignores the commercial breaks is simply because they can. However, the result is that it deepens one of the show’s most important, and yet easy to miss, themes. These people have been lied to all their lives by the very industry they work for and tricked into believing that the right car and the right suit and the right job and the right wife would make them happy. Why would the show help keep up that illusion when it can subvert it instead?

BEST DRAMA SERIES
BEST COMEDY SERIES
Since Mad Men is traditionally a late summer-early fall show, it already feels like forever since its been on. Making matters worse, AMC and show creator Matthew Weiner have been engaged in heated contract talks to keep the show runner attached to the hit series. Today brought both good news and bad news, with AMC announcing it had authorized production on the show, with early 2012 as an air date. The only hitch is that Weiner doesn’t have a deal yet, meaning the show could go on without his guidance. Apparently, AMC is asking for a few things, including reducing two minutes off the show’s run time to run more ads and cutting back on the screentime of some major characters, while Weiner is reportedly asking for somewhere in the range of $30 million, which would make him one of the highest paid showrunners in television. No matter whose side your on, it sounds like a mess that could jeopardize the quality of one of the best shows on television. Stay tuned for more.
It would have been impossible for Lost to answer every lingering question and appease everyone in its final season, but for those hoping for closure for the characters they had grown to know and love, it was an extremely satisfying season. Yes, it’s easy to go after things like the “Heart of the Island,” but there were so many moments, especially in the FlashSideways, that tugged at the heartstrings. Ultimately, the last season of Lost reminded us that the reason the show succeeded while the knockoffs failed because it had characters we wanted to be happy, and in that regard, the ending was a complete success. (M)
If there’s one thing Treme was not, it’s The Wire 2. Viewers looking for Omar and Hamsterdam and “Where’s Wallace” type scenes were bound for disappointment. Those who stuck around, however, were rewarded with a series of rich, warm character portraits. Featuring one of the best casts on TV (including standouts Melissa Leo, Khandi Alexander, Clarke Peters among others), the show felt more alive and more human than anything else currently airing. Even if some of the plot points didn’t quite gel the way we might have hoped (Sonny), the show itself made for a promising start from one of TV’s brightest visionaries. (J)
Community makes it easy to focus on the gadget episodes and pop culture awareness by being so good at it. Episodes like “Modern Warfare” and “Abed’s Uncontrollable Christmas,” Community has made a name for itself with some of the smartest parody episodes ever on TV. But what makes Community a truly outstanding show is the measure of heart and empathy it displays for each one of it’s off-beat characters. From a smarmy lawyer to a high-strung overachiever, the characters on Community have transcended their simply types and become a rich collection of people. (J)
HBO has always been successful at creating full realized worlds within their shows, but Boardwalk Empire takes that to a whole new level. With stunning sets and visuals and top notch acting, the Prohibition Era drama is the successor to The Sopranos the network has been searching for. Steve Buschemi shines as Nuckie Thompson, owning the role completely, and the supporting cast is absolutely phenomenal all around. The first season of Boardwalk Empire ushered in a new era for cable dramas, one in which no idea is too big to put on the small screen. (M)
The people who solve crimes on TV don’t look and act like Donal Logue and Michael Raymond-James. They don’t worry about how to make rent or take cases for a bank manager just to try to secure a loan. And their cases don’t involve women who pretend to have affairs at their husband’s insistence or helping wealthy landowners rob themselves. But Terriers wasn’t like other shows. It had a shaggy, easy-going energy that blended perfectly with its noir elements and some of the best performances on TV. Terriers could regularly punch you in the gut in a way no other TV show did and TV is a flatter place without it. (J)
After a tepid first season, Parks and Recreation emerged in its second season as one of the best shows on network television. The show finally emerged from the shadow of its older brother, The Office, consistently being the funniest show in NBC’s strong Thrusday night lineup. Parks and Rec learned to play up the strengths of its phenomenal cast, with Amy Pohler leading the way, but with Aziz Ansari, Nic Offerman, Aubrey Plaza, and Chris Pratt adding just as many fantastic moments. With the late additions of Rob Lowe and Adam Scott, Parks and Rec looks like it will continue its greatness when it returns in early 2011. (M)
At the end of its third season, Mad Men liberated Don and Betty Draper from their suffocating, destructive marriage, and then spent the fourth season teaching them to beware what they wished for. This season structured itself like a series of interlocking short stories, giving the audience an even more intimate look at the show’s characters than in years’ past. And, in the end, it made all too much sense to see Don fall back into his same pattern, proposing out of nowhere to his pretty secretary while casting aside his intellectual and professional equal Faye. In the end, this season of Mad Men was about what every season of Mad Men is about: the more things change the more they stay the same. (J)
It’s a shame that the best comedy of 2010 was one of the least watched or heard of shows of the same year, yet it seems fitting for a show about characters seemingly doomed for failure. The show didn’t miss a beat all season, and actually added more depth to their characters by taking them out of the parties they catered in episodes like “Steve Gutenberg’s Birthday” or “Party Down Company Picnic.” Ken Marino was once again the show’s MVP as perpetual loser Ron Donald, but I could go on and on how good the rest of the cast was. If you missed out on Party Down, you’re not the only one, but do yourself a favor and correct that. You won’t be sorry. (M)
I meant to recap this season of Breaking Bad, but I just couldn’t do it, at least not without watching each episode three or four times. One week, Breaking Bad could deliver episodes loaded with tension to the point of explosion and then follow them with softer hours that put a close-up focus on the people at the show’s core. Breaking Bad doesn’t let its characters out of making difficult decisions, it doesn’t go gentle on the audience, and it doesn’t play by the rules. From the compelling men at its center – Walter White and Jesse Pinkman – the fascinating characters in their orbit and even people at the periphery, Breaking Bad has created and depicted a world that is fully realized and detailed. (J)
It’s that magic time of year again where the Golden Globe nominations come out and get us excited for the Oscar race, and remind us of all that good TV we’ve been watching. The big guns movie wise got a plethora of nods in the categories that mattered, though True Grit was shut out, perhaps because no one has seen it yet, though it hasn’t stopped some other awards. Thanks to the odd Musical or Comedy category at the Globes, we get a nomination for The Tourist, the “thriller” that got nearly universal critical scorn which made nothing at the box office. Boy, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association sure are tastemakers! The TV nominations are also fairly predictable, but the results should be interesting. Ricky Gervais will host the ceremony January 16. The nominations:
Alright TV fans, this was an Emmy’s for the ages! Here’s our rundown of winners, losers, and surprises!
