Monthly Archives: September 2011

Review: ESPN Films’ Catching Hell

In the interest of full disclosure, I’m a die-hard Cubs fan. My great grandfather started the family tradition when he was a kid living in Chicago, and though I’ve never lived in the Windy City myself, I spend every spring getting my hopes up in time for them to be dashed by mid-June. Game 6 of the 2003 NLCS (otherwise known as the Bartman Game) was a particularly painful night for me, one that is still clearly etched into my mind. When I heard about “Catching Hell,” ESPN’s terrific documentary on the incident and scapegoat culture in baseball, my first reaction was to sigh, realizing I’d get to spend two hours reliving one of the worst nights of my sports fan life.

While it was indeed painful to watch the events of the night unfold (Moises Alou’s reaction to Bartman, Alex Gonzales’ error on a sure thing double play, the Marlin’s 8-run rally), Alex Gibney’s documentary did more than simply talk about an infamous man that people know almost nothing about. Instead, Gibney tells the story of a night in which 40,000 fans let nearly 100 years of disappointment on one guy who made an honest, human mistake.

What makes Catching Hell so interesting is the way in which Gibney dissects every possible angle of the game. He sets the stage by reviewing the Bill Buckner error of the 1986 World Series, pointing out that Buckner may have missed the ball, but it was preceeded by one pitcher loading the bases and another throwing a wild pitch. Buckner just had the bad timing of being last and the most easily remembered. Gibney’s driving question about Bartman comes out right then and there: did he actually cause the Cubs to lose or did they lose it themselves?

Gibney also questions the mob mentality that overtook Wrigley Field and Chicago following the incident. Several of his interview subjects mention that all of the sudden, every fan in the park thought the game and season was over when there was still an inning and a half of baseball to play. The crowd starts chants of “asshole” directed at Bartman. They throw beer on him. One piece of footage featured a fan yelling “put a 12-gauge in his mouth and pull the trigger!” It’s a shameful sight that actually hit closer to home as a Cubs fan than rewatching footage of the actual game. Wrigley Field is supposed to be the Friendly Confines after all.

The most riveting part of Gibney’s documentary is the way he humanizes Bartman. He mentions that Bartman was at the game with two friends, both of whom appear to be trying to distance themselves from him and who left him alone as soon as they could. He interviews the reporter who badgered him right after incident and a fan who was thrown out of the game for harrassing him. Most heartbreakingly, Gibney talked to the security guard that was with Bartman in the aftermath, watching him process what happened and seeing he wasn’t concerned with himself, but whether the Cubs won or lost. Anyone that still hates the man after watching Catching Hell probably has no capacity for sympathy in them.

On the surface, Catching Hell is about scapegoats and the assignment of blame in sports, but deeper, Gibney offers brilliant commentary on the idea of fandom. Gibney only interviews two players on that Cubs team, Alou and first baseman Eric Karros, talking mostly to people that were in the stands or covering the game that night, clearly pulling the film away from the field and into the seats. Did the crowd at Wrigley that night actually lose the game? It’s a big question that Gibney wisely leaves to the viewer, but one that leads to a rabbit hole of questions about the notion of being a fan and the lengths we go to to support teams in our culture.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Movie Review, TV Review

TV Report Card: New Comedies

Welcome to a new TUiW feature, TV Report Card, in which we periodically check in on a show or shows that aren’t in our normal review rotation. Today, we start by evaluating the new comedies of the fall season.

Show: Up All Night
The Good: Christina Applegate and Will Arnett have terrific chemistry is the charming comedy about new parents entering middle age. Maya Rudolph follows up Bridesmaids with a wacky character that will highlight her strengths while adding a touch of the absurd to the show. The pilot had several great bits, including Applegate and Arnett worrying about their swearing in front of the baby and Rudolph bringing the couple a ridiculous gift basket for the baby.
The Bad: Up All Night mostly hit its marks in the pilot, but the already aired second episode was a noticeable step back. The second episode of any new show is usually pretty weak, as the writing staff navigates the transition from pilot to series, so it can be forgiven if the show bounces back in Episode 3.
Potential:Good. Not only does the show have terrific potential, but it was a rating success for NBC, and it wouldn’t be surprising to see the show make a jump to Thursday night if a spot becomes available at mid-season or next year.Show: New Girl
The Good: Zooey Deschanel seems more comfortable in this role than any she’s had on the big screen in years. While it’s still hard to buy her as a socially inept nerd, but her charm carries the show. At its best, New Girl is smart and funny without toying with genre conventions and trying to hard.
The Bad: While Damon Wayans Jr. shined in the pilot, his commitment to Happy Endings led him to be replaced in subsequent episodes. While Zooey carries the show, it’s up to her three roommates to back her up and keep the show moving in the right direction. Based on the performance of the other two, there’s reason for concern.
Potential: Very good. New Girl not only held Glee’s audience, it built on it. You’re going to hear the word “adorkable” for at leas the next three years.

Shows: 2 Broke Girls and Whitney
The Good: Since both shows were written by comedian Whitney Cummings and are in the same vein, it makes sense to group them together. Unfortunately, that also means that there’s not a lot of good in either show. Kat Dennings is perhaps the bright spot of 2 Broke Girls, and her career will only go up after this show.
The Bad: Both shows are centered around hip and snappy women, but Cummings packs in so much unnecessarily raunchy dialogue that does little else than say than to show how edgy the shows are. There’s no substance to either show, and compared to the great comedies on television these days, both 2 Broke Girls and Whitney seem incredibly one-dimensional and stuck in a bygone era in which comedians distilled their stand-up act into a television show.
Potential: 2 Broke Girls will do fine on a network that bases all of its comedies around raunchy jokes and one dimensional characters, so it will be around for at least the foreseeable future. Whitney will have a harder time, especially with 30 Rock returning at midseason and Up All Night doing so well. It will have to step it up big time to survive after fall sweeps.

Show: Free Agents
The Good: Hank Azaria and Kathryn Hahn are terrific and sell the show. Without them, this show suffers tremendously. Their banter and chemistry are impeccable and shouldn’t be missed. The supporting cast backs them up well, adding an extra zing whenever they can.
The Bad: Great chemistry from the leads aside, Free Agents suffers from a lack of good story. Both episodes that have aired have similar plots, and if the show wants to survive, it’s going to need to prove its different than any host of other comedies.
Potential: It doesn’t look good, which is a shame because Azaria and Hahn deserve it. I give it a year at best.

Leave a Comment

Filed under TV Review

A Fond Farewell to R.E.M.

After 31 years, R.E.M. are calling it quits. One of the most important bands of the last three decades, R.E.M. are responsible for the success and popularity of modern indie rock. There are obvious musical descendants, like The National, but every band on an independent label owes a little bit to R.E.M. for helping keep indies financially viable. Even after joining Warner Brothers, the band set the gold standard for artistic integrity in the MTV era, creating compelling, thoroughly enjoyable music without a hiccup for nearly 15 years. Though the band weakened a bit with the departure of drummer Bill Berry after 1997’s New Adventures in Hi Fi, the three remaining members went through a renaissance on their last two albums, 2008’s Accelerate and this year’s Collapse Into Now. Undoubtedly, their legacy will be centered into what they did between 1981 and 1995, but what the band leaves behind is a tremendous catalogue of music that very few bands can match.

While countless tributes will be offered up by writers and critics more important and influential than myself, I can’t sit by and fail to comment on a band that has meant more to be than can be put into words. I was born in the mid-80s, and by then, Murmer and Reckoning had already made the band one of the most respected and beloved bands of the decade. Because of this, I quite literally grew up on the band. I very clearly remember the first time I heard them. Driving home one night as a kid, I was in the back, clamoring for my parents to put something on. My dad told me that we were going to listen to something he and my mom wanted to hear, and he put on a mix tape of R.E.M. songs. To call the moment transformative would be a stretch, but even as a kid, I instantly fell in love with the band. I may not have known what the hell “Losing My Religion” meant, but it was an incredibly catchy song that was impossible not to be drawn to.

As I got older and dug into the band’s catalogue, I could hear R.E.M. in many new bands I was discovering. Thom Yorke’s love of Michael Stipe was evident. The Decemberists clearly were fans of Peter Buck. Countless acts aped the tight rhythm section of Mike Mills and Bill Berry. I joined fan club, feverishly downloaded every bootleg and b-side, and finally in November 2004, got a chance to see R.E.M. play in Indianapolis. During the closer, “Man on the Moon,” I bounced up and down, the guy with graying hair next to me watched on amused. “You shoulda seen them in the 80s,” he said.
By ending now, R.E.M. isn’t quitting at their peak, but at a high point, sparing us from seeing them devolve into a soulless touring entity (the Rolling Stones), lose their cool (U2) or begin to crumble internally (Metallica). Instead we’re left with the music and memories of a band that comes along only once in a generation.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Music News